nicht, dass die die bude abbrennt
285 GTX SLI... Teaser
-
-
Das passiert nur mit Furmark. Aber wärmer wirds echt hier, wenn die Kiste Gas gibt, lol.
Und weil mir fad ist kommt noch einer für Mami:
[Blockierte Grafik: http://www.xin.at/thrawn/pics/hw/corei7920/physx_3600.gif]
-
So, mangels Schererei hab ich auf 190MHz BCLK gschissn, und gleich 200 probiert. Erfolg: Keiner.
Das Sys postet zwar, aber ich bring den Dreck ned ins Windows. Uncore und QPI habe ich so niedrig gehalten wie nur geht, Auch probiert, VCore und VUncore zu erhöhen, selbes Ergebnis. Immer Freeze beim WinXP Splash Logo, und dann Instant Reboot. Uncore hab ich getestet, an dem liegts nicht. QPI kA... Core.. könnt ich mir am ehesten vorstellen.
VCore war bis 1.3V, Uncore 1.35V, DRAM/MC 1.66V. Mehr VCore ist denk ich mitm Noctua nicht sinnvoll zu testen.
Werd ich wohl auf 3.8GHz Core auch pfeifen, und bei 3.6GHz bleiben, das ist dann wohl wenigstens stabil. Uncore hab ich mal gehoben auf ~3.05GHz, um mehr L3 Cacheleistung zu kriegen.
Eine Frage: Was sind denn erfahrungsgemäß sichere Uncore Voltages, wie stark beeinflussen die die Hitzeentwicklung, und wie hoch kann man Uncore so Daumen mal Pi im Schnitt treiben? Thx!
Anmk.: Kopie dieses Posts auch bei oc.at, wollte ned doppelt tippen, möge man mir vergeben! Und: Der Core i7 ist so ein komplizierter Misthaufen zum Takten, das ist ja echt unfaßbar! Sogar CPU PLL kann ich spannen, und dann noch die Skews und diese Differentialspannungen, da wirst ja völlig IRRE!!
-
It's always the voltage...
[Blockierte Grafik: http://www.xin.at/thrawn/pics/hw/corei7920/cpu-z_4000.gif]
Stabil? Ich denk nicht. Kühlbar? Wohl auch nicht.. Aber für CPU-Z hat's ja Mal gereicht.
-
Stabil? Ich denk nicht. Kühlbar? Wohl auch nicht.. Aber für CPU-Z hat's ja Mal gereicht.
Schade dass nicht! Vielleicht mit nem TRUE?
-
It's always the voltage...
[Blockierte Grafik: http://www.xin.at/thrawn/pics/hw/corei7920/cpu-z_4000.gif]
Stabil? Ich denk nicht. Kühlbar? Wohl auch nicht.. Aber für CPU-Z hat's ja Mal gereicht.
Now thisis more like it, you seemed to have reached the magical 4000Mhz barrier, but does it run stable? I surely hope so, 4000Mhz is a very nice rounded number rightIt is 4x 400Mhz per core, hence the Hyper Threading does not count as real cores, still a very nice achievement if it runs stable at this awesome speed
I wish you all the best, if it doesn't try to increase it's V-Core.
May The Force Be With You Admiral.
-
It works at 4GHz, but not with full load + HT. It will shatter as soon as it's being hammered with Octal Prime95 SmallFFT torture, so here the core is at its end. Raising the voltage further is not an option anymore, as I'm already hitting my head on the TJunctionMax Ceiling. No more room, temperature-wise. So this is to be considered possible only with watercooling i guess. 3.8GHz runs somewhat nice, but I'll revert back to 3.6GHz. I also don't think, that another aircooler would make all the difference..
That is:
- BCLK reference Clock Speed: 180MHz
- Core Clock Speed: BCLK * 20 = 3600MHz (Turbo Mode off)
- Uncore Clock Speed: BCLK * 18 = 3240MHz (maximum, as Uncore may not exceed QPI speed)
- QPI Clock Speed: BCLK * 18 = 3240MHz / 6480MT/s
- DRAM Clock Speed: BCLK * 4 = 720MHz = DDR-III/1440
Voltages:- Core: 1.28V
- Uncore: 1.325V
- CPU PLL: 1.92V
- DRAM: 1.60V
- CPU Differential Amplitude: 0.8V
As for the GTX's:- Rasterizer Domain Clock Speed: 700MHz
- Shader Domain Clock Speed: 1536MHz
- GDDR-III Clock Speed: 1300MHz = GDDR-III/2600
-
Um das Thema OS abzuschließen:
Ich mir jetzt das XP durch die Clockerei erfolgreich zerschossen, bzw. einige System-DLLs beschädigt. Jetzt gab's zwei Möglichkeiten: Entweder von der CD reparieren, oder wieder x64 probieren.
Ich habe x64 probiert, und dieses Mal läuft's! Setup ging auch VIEL schneller als zuvor mit dem NEC Brenner, und wollte keine File Retries mehr. Da scheint das kleine Chinesenlaufwerk Daten zerschossen zu haben beim letzten Installationsversuch. Windows XP Professional x64 Edition läuft jetzt, und sehr fein dazu!
-
Your setup is just awesome GAT anywyas I am having some troubles choosing what GTX 285's to take for my setup heh
After some reading around and finding out that a 2-way GTX 285 setup is a better buy than a 2-way GTX 295 setup hence the more ram per GPU as the scalability per GPU compared to a single card and no more ram limitations I came accross this EVGA SSC 2GB variant of their GTX 285.
EVGA GTX 285 SSC 2GBNow the screen I use today is an iiyama B2403WS-B1 Full HD 24" TFT and I have plans on getting a slightly bigger screen a 27" from Dell.
As for the VGA's here's my question.
What is wiser get Dual EVGA GTX 285 2GB's or 2x 1GB models? since a 27" has a much larger area to fill a 3D image than a 24", so I thought then a VGA card would need more ram to fill it or am I mixed up with something here?
I have been just a little confused about this, I want Dual GTX 285's, but I just got a little lost from what to take and even do these 2GB cards have a greater advantage for real time flight simulators than their 1GB counterparts? or would you say get the 1GB SSC's or XFX BE's and stick with those instead? :wacko:
I hope someone can give some more detailed advice on this one, I made a new topic because going off topic in other places isn't a right way of doing
-
I'd say, for the moment, a 2GB card doesn't yield too much of an advantage over a 1GB one. You are right about the screen though, a bigger screen will need more VRAM, or more precisely (and correctly): A bigger resolution will consume more VRAM, especially with FSAA and maybe even Supersampling being active.
However, nowadays, the framebuffer (the actual pixel data) isn't the main issue about VRAM consumption anymore, it's more the textures in the 3D engine, that consume most memory. So even in my case, with 2560x1600 in FP32 (128-Bit color) with HDRR and FSAA, I don't hit the ceiling. I would say, get the 2GB, if it's about the same price, but in any other case, go for 2 x 1GB cards..
-
I'd say, for the moment, a 2GB card doesn't yield too much of an advantage over a 1GB one. You are right about the screen though, a bigger screen will need more VRAM, or more precisely (and correctly): A bigger resolution will consume more VRAM, especially with FSAA and maybe even Supersampling being active.
However, nowadays, the framebuffer (the actual pixel data) isn't the main issue about VRAM consumption anymore, it's more the textures in the 3D engine, that consume most memory. So even in my case, with 2560x1600 in FP32 (128-Bit color) with HDRR and FSAA, I don't hit the ceiling. I would say, get the 2GB, if it's about the same price, but in any other case, go for 2 x 1GB cards..
Ah okayWell I chose for Dual EVGA GTX 285 SSC 1GB's even that ASUS is making the perfect GX2 a GTX 295 with 2x 512Bit 2GB GDDR3 per PCB and with Dual GTX 285 240 SPU'ed GPU's...
http://www.techpowerup.com/95445/ASUS_Des…phics_Card.html
http://www.techpowerup.com/img/09-05-28/2c.jpghttp://www.techpowerup.com/img/09-05-28/2a.jpg
http://www.techpowerup.com/img/09-05-28/2b.jpgOh well, rather overkill but on the other side this does bring the idea of the GeForce 7900 GX2 SC from EVGA back, as by combining Dual Top end VGA's in a single package.
Once I get home, I'll get these Dual GTX 285 SSC 1GB's, these will be fine for my doings after this long lasting Scandic holiday hehe.
As for their speeds they run stock @
Core: 702Mhz
SPU's: 1584Mhz
Ram: 2646Mhz DDR
My goal is to take these babies to a higher speed level with their stock coolers to these:
Core: 702Mhz --> 800Mhz
SPU's: 1584Mhz --> 1700Mhz
Ram: 2646Mhz DDR --> 2800Mhz DDR
If you'd say wow too high or if these speeds would be doable or have a better speed indication for these black monsters, lemmie know man, heck I don't even know what these cards are even capable of at their stock speeds but if they can fly faster why not right
And for you other EVGA GTX 285 people , take a glimpse at this cool upgrade! a backplate!
http://www.evga.com/products/moreI…&family=GeForce
[Blockierte Grafik: http://www.evga.com/PRODUCTS/IMAGE…182-AR_LG_4.jpg]For now only with FTW cards but like we all know there are backplates sold seperatly for GTX 295's so maybe we'll have the same for the GTX 285 cards Let's hope so right, would make them look more dreased up
-
Psycho GX2
-
Psycho GX2
ahuuuh Psycho GX2 HE [Hels Edition]
-
that card is for sure absolutely crazy
-
Yeah but the upside is with two of these in Quad SLI you'll won't have to worry if your system doesn't have the GPU power to render a very insane graphical program And for Cuda 960 SPU's + 4x 2GB 512Bit GDDR3 would surely come to a great help heck even for CAD operations two of these would do very well and you'd be cheaper than any type of Quadro FX card that would compete with a set of those.
So for some point they can yet come in great handy, back when 3dfx was making the Voodoo5 6000 AGP 128MB everyone said damn quad SLI with 4x 32MB that was for then very insane as well but nowadays a VGA with 128MB is a very normal thing same goes for 256, 512 and even 1024MB and 2048 MB per chip is going to be the new standard within a 2 years time, so yeah ASUS may be somewhat early but on the other side it can get usefull over time, kinda future proof for that part and a very cool experiment none the less since only 1000 will be built.
-
ahuuuh Psycho GX2 HE [Hels Edition]
That's mine then
-
Hi GAT
Well after some time I placed a massive order 2 days ago and my Dual OpteronDP 2380 C2 will have this config:
Blue Leader
Dual OpteronDP 2380 C2 Shanghai, 8x 2500Mhz , 8x 512KB L2 & 2x 6MB L3 & 6x 32Bit 2000Mhz HT Links
2x ASUS Triton 70 Socket F+ coolers
Super-Micro H8DAE-2 with NVidia NForce 3600 Pro chipset + MCP 55 Pro & IO55.
4x 4096MB PC2-6400 ECC Reg Kingston Value Ram
2x EVGA GeForce GTX 285 SSC 2GB 512Bit GDDR3 in 32 Lane PCI-E 2.0 SLI
1x 3dfx Voodoo5 5500 PCI 64MB Rev.A1 2900 256Bit SDR [In practical 2x 32MB 128Bit SDR] in PCI-X 100Mhz @ 32 Bit PCI 66Mhz Bus
6x Western Digital 500GB RE3 SATA II 300 HDD's in Raid 5
1x Samsung 3,5" FDD Drive
1x Plextor PX-800A 18x / 8x / 8x DVD Re-Writer
Realtek AC'97 7.1 Onboard HD Audio
1x Antec Quattro Series 1000 Watts + EPS12V PSU
1x Supermicro IPMI 2.0 AOC-SIMLP-B Card
2x Sharkoon 30cm White CCFL's
2x Sharkoon 30cm Blue CCFL's
Lian Li PC- A7010B
Lian Li W-75BP Side Window Kit
Windows Vista Business 64 + SP2 with Windows 7 Professional 64 Voucher.I'll keep this thread updated
-
Hehe, you won't be disappointed, I'm pretty sure about that! And show us what the IPMI card can do, as soon as you familiarized yourself with it, this gotta be interesting..
-
Well after some deep research I came to my point, I went for an EVGA GeForce GTX 295 Red Edition this baby:
[Blockierte Grafik: http://www.hardware.info/images/news/evga_gtx295_red04_550.jpg]
[Blockierte Grafik: http://img.hexus.net/v2/news/EVGA/gtx-295-red-back.jpg]A month from now I will buy a second EVGA 295 with backplate but a black one Then I'll have a quad SLI setup over 32 PCI-E 2.0 lanes and hereby the most powerful setup I can create for my Dual OpteronDP 2380 C2 Shanghai.
-
Well today the EVGA GeForce GTX 295 Red Edition PCI-E 2.0 1792MB GDDR3 Rev.A2 1509 arrived, so here's my photo shootout of this red monster:
[Blockierte Grafik: http://www.3dfx.ch/gallery/d/36373-2/The+GTX+295+RE_s+massive+side+vent.JPG]
-